STRENGTHENING ASEAN TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH SUSTAINABLE AND DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE: A COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR RESILIENT DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • I Gusti Made Juniarta Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia
  • Cing Cing Wahyuni Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia
  • Pungky Dios Purnomo Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia
  • Dyah Palupinigtyas Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32524/ukmcic.v3i1.2330

Keywords:

tourism infrastructure, sustainable tourism, digital transformation, destination competitiveness, tourism resilience

Abstract

ASEAN tourism destinations are entering a new phase of recovery and transformation following major disruptions caused by the COVID-nineteen pandemic, climate change, geopolitical uncertainty, and rapid technological advancements. Consequently, tourism infrastructure has evolved from conventional physical support into a strategic system integrating connectivity, sustainability, digital technology, community participation, and resilience. Although ASEAN international visitor arrivals reached approximately one hundred twenty-seven point one million in two thousand twenty-four, persistent disparities in infrastructure capacity and destination competitiveness remain. This study aims to comparatively examine tourism infrastructure management across ASEAN countries across three strategic dimensions: sustainable infrastructure, digital transformation, and destination competitiveness and resilience. Employing a comparative qualitative-descriptive approach, the study analyzes secondary data from official publications, national policies, and international reports through the frameworks of Systems Theory, the Triple Bottom Line, Destination Competitiveness Theory, and eTourism perspectives. The findings indicate varying levels of readiness across ASEAN: Singapore excels in integrated digital infrastructure; Malaysia and Thailand possess strong connectivity; Indonesia, Viet Nam, and the Philippines demonstrate vast potential but face spatial distribution and carrying capacity challenges; while emerging destinations require stronger connectivity and institutional capacity. Ultimately, infrastructure competitiveness must integrate green, digital, connected, inclusive, and resilient elements. To address this, the study proposes the ASEAN Integrated Sustainable-Digital Tourism Infrastructure Model, or ASDTIM, to guide policymakers and regional stakeholders. 

References

ASEAN Secretariat. (2024). ASEAN sustainable tourism development: Action roadmap for sustainable tourism development in ASEAN.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2025a). ASEAN tourism: A destination for every dream.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2025b). ASEAN tourism outlook 2025.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2026). Joint statement of the ASEAN tourism ministers on advancing sustainable and resilient tourism development.

Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet—The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management, 29(4), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005

Dwyer, L., & Kim, C. (2003). Destination competitiveness: Determinants and indicators. Current Issues in Tourism, 6(5), 369–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500308667962

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Gössling, S., Scott, D., & Hall, C. M. (2021). Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708

Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism: Foundations and developments. Electronic Markets, 25, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8

Hall, C. M. (2019). Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial implications of sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(7), 1044–1060.

Kuntariningsih, A. (2026). Manajemen infrastruktur pariwisata. PT Nasya Expanding Management. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=G6HFEQAAQBAJ

Leiper, N. (1990). Tourist attraction systems. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90004-B

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.

Ritchie, B. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019). A review of research on tourism risk, crisis and disaster management: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research curated collection on tourism risk, crisis and disaster management. Annals of Tourism Research, 79, Article 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102812

UN Tourism. (2024). International tourism highlights.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.

UNWTO. (2018). ‘Overtourism’? Understanding and managing urban tourism growth beyond perceptions. World Tourism Organization.

World Bank. (2023). Tourism and development in Southeast Asia.

World Economic Forum. (2024). Travel & tourism development index 2024: Travel & tourism at a tipping point.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23

How to Cite

Juniarta, I. G. M., Wahyuni, C. C., Purnomo, P. D., & Palupinigtyas, D. (2026). STRENGTHENING ASEAN TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH SUSTAINABLE AND DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE: A COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR RESILIENT DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT. UKMC International Conference (UKMC IC) Proceedings, 3(1), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.32524/ukmcic.v3i1.2330

Issue

Section

ARTIKEL UKMC IC