PERBEDAAN PERSEPSI MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI AKUNTANSI DAN MANAJEMEN TERHADAP KUALITAS LAYANAN JASA PENDIDIKAN DI UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK MUSI CHARITAS PALEMBANG

Authors

  • Maria Josephine Tyra
  • Andreas Sarjono

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32524/jkb.v16i1.572

Keywords:

Perception, Quality of education service.

Abstract

The research is aim to observe consumer behavior regarding the perception of the
five dimensions of education quality including reliability, responsiveness,
assurance, empathy, and physical evidence from the Musi Charitas Catholic
University (MCCU). The purpose of the study is to prove whether there is a
difference in the perception of education qualityfrom the students in Management
and Accounting Study Program. Data collection techniques used is to spread the
5-point Likert questionnaire that is from very disagree until strongly agree.
Population in this research is active student, Batch 2015/2016 untilBatch
2016/2017 Management and Accounting Study Program. Based on the results of
the differences test using the Mann-Whitney test proved that the perception of
Accounting studentson the quality of education (Mdn = 2143) generaly difference
and significant with the students perception of Managementon the quality of
education in MCCU (Mdn = 2907) with significance 0.008 <0.05 (Ho is rejected).
If it is seen from each variable, then reliability, responsiveness, and
guaranteeprove the difference of perception between student of Accounting and
Management Study Program. While the variable of empathy and physical
evidence didn’t prove the difference of perception between student of Accounting
and Management Study Program.

References

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS.

Cetakan IV. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Haryadi, Bambang, Soekarno, dan Llewelyn, Richard. 2005. Persepsi Kualitas

Pendidikan, Fasilitas, dan Staf Pengajar di Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas

Kristen Petra, Surabaya

Ilyas, Imran. 2013. Pengaruh Persepsi Kualitas Pelayanan dan Persepsi Biaya

Pendidikan Terhadap Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Mahasiswa/i. STIE

Pembangunan Tanjung Pinang. Koleksi Perpustakaan Universitas

Terbuka, Program Pasca Sarjana UT, Jakarta

Kotler, Philip dan Armstong, Gary. 2008. Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran. Jilid 1.

Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

Lovelock, C., dan L. Wright. 1990. Principles of Service Marketing and

Management. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc.

Munandir. 2002. “Pengaruh Bimbingan Belajar Terhadap Sikap, Minat, Motivasi,

dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMU di Kota Makassar”. Jurnal Insani.

(2):21-29.

Munawaroh, Munjiati. 2005. Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Jasa Terhadap Kepuasan

Pada Industri Pendidikan di Yogyakarta. Edisi Khusus JSB ON

Marketing

Owlia, M.S., dan E.M. Aspinwall. 1997. “TQM in higher education”. Journal of

Quality and Reliability Management. 14(5): 47-59.

Parasuraman, Zeithaml, A.V. dan Berry L.L. (1985), ‘A Conceptual Model of

Service Quality’, Journal of Retailing, Vol.67:420-450

Sugiyono (2004). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta, CV. Bandung.

Robbins, Stephen P. 1998. Organizational Behavior.8th edition. New Jersey.

Prentice Hall

Schiffman, L.G., dan L.L. Kanuk. 2002. Consumer Behavior. 7th edition. New

Jersey. Prentice Hall.

Sekaran, Uma. 2016. Research Methods For Business (Metodologi Penelitian

untuk Bisnis). Buku 2. Edisi 4. Penerbit Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Sulastiyono. 1999. Pengantar Ilmu Perpustakaan. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Jakarta

Downloads

Published

2018-04-29